There are too many variables to consider, but bottomline is, VA has been on par with IPS colors for years. Even if a graph looks good, the colors in person might not. Amateurs using colorimeters get accurate results, because you literally attach it to the screen, and it takes (somewhat inaccurate) samples. IPS, with even the slightest glow, can't display accurate colors, that's ridiuclous. an IPS, or even the GW2470H, on the very low budget side of monitors on the market. VA colors are equal to IPS, I've used both. Unfortunately most people think that lower is better, but in reality it doesn't, they came up with other solutions, because even lowering the fixed response time (not the dynamic response time advertised), they still didn't get rid of ghosting, hence why these three exists. 60 Hz is hardware limited to 16.67, using lightboost would cause a flicker. Not because it's advertised as a lower number. You know why there's no blur on "gaming" monitors? ULMB, black frame insertion, and lightboost. The response times doesn't mean anything. ![]() At least if you choose an IPS over a TN, your only compromising the response time and input lag. They are a compromise between IPS an TN, meaning to me that they won't look as good as an IPS, or game as well as the TN's. For gaming, they have higher input lag and response times which lead to ghosting and blurriness. ![]() May be superior in some ways, but not in others.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |